The preliminary Forensic Audit Report of BDL by Alvarez and Marsal Middle East was released by the Ministry of Finance last week. We will focus in this economic digest on two points raised by the report: the FX Reserves Spent by BDL between 2010 and 2020 and the Cost of Financial Engineering between 2015 and 2019.
The table below provides a summary of how BDL’s FX reserves were used to meet the “requirements” of the Lebanese government between 2010 and 2020:
Uses | USD Million |
Ministry of Energy and BDL | |
Credits to EDL | 18,386.1 |
Transfers to EDL | 543.1 |
Ministry of Energy | 5,608.3 |
FX Requirement of Public Sector | |
Credits | 235.9 |
Transfers | 8,084.1 |
Financing of Subsidies on Imports | 7,572.9 |
Net Negative Balance on Eurobonds | 7,446.9 |
Total FX Reserves Paid by BDL | 47,877.4 |
As we can see, the FX spent was $47.9 billion, more than the average GDP for the period. The three biggest items were transfers to EDL, followed by requirements of the public sector and then subsidies to vital imports. The irony is that after all these major expenditures, the country remains at more than 20 hours a day in the dark, public institutions are in shambles, and basic poverty at more than 50%.
In 2015, BDL reported that it is taking action to bolster the supply of USD to the banking system through a scheme referred to as Financial Engineering. It was designed to achieve two objectives:
BDL’s “Financial Engineering” was accomplished in two phases: Phase 1 from 2015 to 2018 known as Swaps with Commissions; and Phase 2 from 2017 to 2019 known as Loans under Leverage. For Phase 1, Swaps with Commission, it involved the following:
In 2017, BDL introduced the scheme Loans under Leverage. It involved the following:
The costs of the above financial engineering operations were as follows:
Interestingly, when presented of these costs by A&M, BDL commented: “the amount of 115 trillion LBP referred to as cumulative cost of financial engineering covers both costs channeled to the deferral pool (85 trillion LBP) and premiums on TBs and CDs (30 trillion LBP). It is worth noting that the 30 trillion LBP …. Will be fully offset by coupon revenues till maturity of the said TBs and CDs. Hence, the cost during 2015-2016 is around 85 trillion LBP and not 115 trillion LBP”.
Additionally, BDL reported offsets to the above, arising from: amortized interest, commissions, seigniorage currency, seigniorage financial stability, and seigniorage-TB swaps, amounting to about 80 trillion LBP. As a result, if we accept BDL’s above justification and offsets, the net cost of financial engineering will be: 85 – 80 = 5 trillion LBP or about $3.3 billion. And this figure seems to agree with anecdotal evidence from banking circles in Lebanon.
In retrospect, whether the cost of financial engineering was $3.3 billion or more is largely immaterial. Its more permanent and significant damage is that it had enabled BDL to acquire depositors (mostly FX) money and used it to fund wasteful public expenditures, instead of BDL confronting the state and insisting that it reforms itself so as to generate its own hard-earned financing!